Albert White wrote: > Those look striaghtoforward enough changes. > > Are these the only occurances of classifications in empty packages? > Just wondering if an audit is worthwhile.
I think so. I did a check of "empty" <cough>deleted</cough> packages as part of checking a previous classification bug. I think I've fixed all of them now. These cluster packages that are "empty" (i.e. just have depend lines) are a slightly different beast. They should all exist under .../distro-import/unbundleds, or in some of the ones we moved to .../distro-import/101a/common so they'd get rev'ed correctly. I also think we've got 'em all now too. > Rich Burridge wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I'm looking for a review of the fix for bug #5615: >> >> http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=5615 >> some empty packages still have classifications >> >> Webrev is at: >> >> http://cr.opensolaris.org/~richb/pkg-5615-v1/ >> >> Thanks. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> pkg-discuss mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss >> > _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
