On Fri 09 Jan 2009 at 03:42PM, Danek Duvall wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 03:25:01PM -0800, Stuart Kreitman wrote:
>
> > I first tried it this morning around 9am. It got pretty busy, and created
> > the new clone "solaris-1",
> > which I'm booting into. Could this be related to upgrade activities that
> > may have taken place this morning?
>
> Possibly. The output of "pkg history" may be useful, but it sounds like it
> found something to upgrade to, since it created a new BE. There are a
> couple of "build 101" package sets -- if you'd installed with an earlier
> one, and upgraded before build 105 was pushed earlier today, then your
> system would have done a bunch of thinking and spinning, downloaded next to
> nothing, but created a new BE that was essentially identical to the
> original one.
>
> But that assumes that you've got your authority set to pkg.opensolaris.org,
> which you obviously don't, since you're a Sun employee and you've been
> asked dozens of times not to do, since using the internal server saves us
> money, right?
It's likely that what he got was the minor respin to just the "entire"
incorporation which happened at some point. It wouldn't matter if he's
following ipkg.sfbay or pkg.o.o. Unless he specifically hooked up to
the dev repo there, he won't get b105.
-dp
--
Daniel Price - Solaris Kernel Engineering - d...@eng.sun.com - blogs.sun.com/dp
_______________________________________________
pkg-discuss mailing list
pkg-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
