On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 08:47:24AM -0800, Rich Burridge wrote: > John Levon wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 08:31:18AM -0800, Rich Burridge wrote: > > > >> http://cr.opensolaris.org/~richb/pkg-6247-6250-v1/ > > > > The xvm cluster no longer needs to depend explicitly on SUNWxvm, since > > SUNWvirtinst will now bring it in. Looks good to me otherwise - thanks > > for picking these up so quickly!
I dunno. Seems like SUNWxvm is really the primary dependency, and ought to be explicit, even if it's brought in by another package. The goal isn't to have the minimum dependency set that happens to pull in all the packages, but to describe the dependencies in a semantically logical way. Of course, if SUNWvirtinst is really the best way to pull in SUNWxvm, then by all means -- remove the explicit dependency on SUNWxvm. Danek _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
