Danek Duvall wrote: > On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 11:41:41PM -0500, Jim Dunham wrote: > > >>> Adding Jim to the cc: for the definitive answer on why the version >>> number is 11.11.0 for that cluster... >>> >> If there is a viable reason to change this value to something else, please >> submit a CR. >> > > There's no point in changing it in Nevada -- the values are meaningless > except to define a monotonically increasing sequence. Choosing some small > number for OpenSolaris means that you can give it a meaningful number at > some point in the future if you choose, or we'll just give it a number that > matches whatever the "generic OS" packages get. >
I should learn to read all my email before responding. Okay, I won't file a request in Bugster. The IPS cluster definition will be "0.1". _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
