Stephen Hahn wrote:
Here's a second webrev for the package renaming for the unbundleds
packages:
http://cr.opensolaris.org/~richb/pkg-6941-v2
...
unbundleds/DTraceGUI:
6. develop/ide/netbeans/ide. Why "develop/ide/netbeans" and not
just "develop/netbeans"? How populated do you expect the ide
subset to be?
Frank and I have previously discussed the proposed new names.
(Correct me if I'm getting this wrong Frank, but) my understanding
is that Frank would like to see a correlation between the
existing categories/sub-categories and the new naming hierarchy.
For example, NetBeans and Eclipse have the category/sub-category
of "Development/Integrated Development Environments", so it
would follow that the naming hierarchy for those packages would
start with "develop/ide/...", or perhaps even "development/ide/...".
Note that if that was deemed a good idea, then this would
have a fairly big effect on the existing proposed names for the
complete package renaming (see bug #6186).
Thoughts?
16. develop/ide/netbeans/dtrace/gui-plugin. "gui-plugin" is a bad
package basename, since it is non-specific. Either
"dtrace-gui-plugin" or "dtrace-gui".
Okay. I'll go with "dtrace-gui-plugin" once we've sorted
out the other issues.
unbundleds/Eclipse:
*. Same as for the NetBeans naming. If there are only two - four
IDEs, and they are all significant, why not just have them
top-level within develop/?
See above.
unbundleds/GlassFishV2:
1. I don't really think we need both "-[number]" and "-v[number]"
conventions. So "glassfish-2".
Okay.
unbundleds/MessageQueue41:
3. Hard to figure out the right category for this one. It's not
really a system service.
Any suggestions for an alternative?
Complete list is at:
http://opensolaris.org/os/community/sw-porters/contributing/ipsclass/
unbundleds/NetBeans:
*. What's the difference between a component in
develop/ide/netbeans/library/ and a component that's in
develop/ide/netbeans?
My understanding that the various packages under
develop/ide/netbeans
are "top-level" packages. I.e. NetBeans for developing Java,
NetBeans for developing PHP etc.
The packages under
develop/ide/netbeans/library/
are libraries that are used by those "top-level" NetBeans
packages.
25. I don't think we want "incorporation" as a basename. Does
installing this package allow NetBeans to update its own
components?
I believe it allows you to keep all the NetBeans sub-packages
at the same version number. I don't know about the updating
part. Bart wrote this, so I've added him to the To: line for a
response here.
So do we want to just keep this with the old
"netbeans-incorporation" name?
unbundleds/OpenDS:
1. I think this package and MessageQueue41 should be nearby in the
category space. A server shouldn't generally be in a library
category, for instance. Maybe system/network/naming/opends?
Okay.
2. Not sure I like this category, but don't have a better
suggestion.
Okay.
unbundleds/OpenOffice:
1. Not a system package. Looking at your full fix, I would suggest
either command/openoffice or maybe editor/openoffice.
Okay. Frank didn't like this one either. I don't think of
OpenOffice as an editor, so I'll change it to "command/openoffice".
Or maybe if we are going to have a correlation between the classifications
and the package naming hierarchy, then "applications/openoffice"? ...
unbundleds/Studio:
1. Drop "ide", unless we come up with a good reason to keep it.
Okay. I'll await your reply to the commentary above
before I do this.
unbundles/Webstackui:
1. Is there a better name than "webstackui"? Would "webstack-gui"
be better, given "dtrace-gui"? (That is, should "-gui" be the
standard suffix for graphical wrappers?)
"web/webstack-gui" works for me.
Thanks for the feedback.
_______________________________________________
pkg-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
