"0.2008.11 -> 0.2009.3"
The 2008.11 to 2009.3 part looks good
Does anyone know the rationale behind starting our version numbers with 0?
I don't think we ever asked for that.
Is it some kind of comment on our product readiness? :-)
When we start delivering FCS versions, we expect them to be numbered
something sensible like 12.1, 13.0, etc. But the express releases are
named using the release dates. AFAIK, since they will be in different
packages ("sunstudio" vs "sunstudioexpress", and installed into different
directories ("/opt/SunStudioExpress" vs "/opt/SunStudio"), it shouldn't
be a
problem to have different numbering schemes.
--chris
Rich Burridge wrote:
Hi all,
I'm looking for a review of the fix for bug #7626:
http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=7626
Need to update the version number of Studio unbundled release.
Webrev is at:
http://cr.opensolaris.org/~richb/pkg-7626-v1/
Thanks.
_______________________________________________
pkg-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
_______________________________________________
pkg-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
