Padraig O'Briain wrote:
Michal,
In updatemanager.py you have removed two icons.
What has happened to the functionality that used those ico
This was artefact of the progress dialog which was persistent in the UM
and was replaced for 2009.06 with common progress dialog for PM/UM.
So this piece of the code was not reachable starting from 2009.06
together with progress class and related progress functions, that is why
I have cleaned up and cut ~800lines of the code.
Michal
ns?
Padraig
On 06/22/09 14:50, Michal Pryc wrote:
Padraig,
As you told over the phone having /usr/bin before /usr/gnu/bin in the
PATH solved the problem with webrev links:
http://cr.opensolaris.org/~migi/progress_modifications_v6/
best
Michal
Michal Pryc wrote:
I did send this message from my other account so it was not
delivered to the pkg-discuss. Resending this mail with question,
what information? debug one?
Michal
Padraig O'Briain wrote:
Michal,
Can you respin the webrev so that I do not get the message below
when I try to access any of the files?
Padraig
D'oh!
You have reached this page because an error occurred. If you think
that there could be a problem which requires our attention, please
let us know at *website-discuss AT opensolaris DOT org*
To learn more about this site, go to the main page
<http://cr.opensolaris.org/>.
On 06/22/09 13:40, Michal Pryc wrote:
Hello,
Bug:
http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=9596
Currently there are two implementations of the progress class
included in the
PM and UM code. This should be separated to allow benefit both
apps from one
common class.
Webrev:
http://cr.opensolaris.org/~migi/progress_modifications_v5/
The webrev contains some debug information, which will be removed.
Michal
_______________________________________________
pkg-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
_______________________________________________
pkg-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss