On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 01:39:04PM -0700, Rich Burridge wrote: > Danek Duvall wrote: > >Comments and critiques appreciated. Substantive ones requested by COB > >Wednesday. > > With this proposal, is > http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=5779 > now obsolete?
No, that work is still valid, though the syntax you came up with is different than what I did, and I was proposing that pkg(5) could figure out whether a package was being obsoleted or replaced based on whether there were any dependencies. Danek _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
