Shawn Walker wrote:
Tom Mueller (plain-text) wrote:
pkg(1) now prints a message and returns 1. However, for a user image
where the user is unable to change the ownership of a file anyway, not
having the required user/group is ignored.
I don't agree with the assumption that a user image automatically
implies that a user doesn't have the permissions to change ownership of
a file.
I agree Shawn it isn't a valid assumption that the user can't change
ownership of the file. On the other hand it might not be an error for a
user image maybe just a warning.
--
Darren J Moffat
_______________________________________________
pkg-discuss mailing list
pkg-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss