Chris Ridd wrote:
On 16 Dec 2009, at 16:10, Shawn Walker wrote:
Chris Ridd wrote:
That looks like it will update the affected packages and change the publisher
name at the same time. Is it safe to do this image-update?
It should be. You can always create an alternate BE using "pfexec beadm create
<name>" or create a zfs snapshot so you can rollback.
It seems to have come up OK, but has not surprisingly given me a 129 BE with a
mixture of pkg://opensolaris-dev/ packages (things that didn't change in 129)
and pkg://opensolaris.org/ packages (things which did).
Hopefully that won't cause problems going on to 130...
It shouldn't. But I'd keep around your old BE if you can spare the
space just in case unexpected issues arise.
--
Shawn Walker
_______________________________________________
pkg-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
