On 06/ 7/10 03:59 PM, Danek Duvall wrote:
I've a wad for pkgmogrify to take care of the following:

     14052 pkgmogrify: extended output capabilities could simplify complex 
publication makefiles
     16022 pkgmogrify should be able to reference package attributes
     16024 pkgmogrify abort operation isn't particularly useful

The webrev is at

     http://cr.opensolaris.org/~dduvall/pkg-pkgmog/

src/man/pkgmogrify.1.txt:
  lines 118-155: nit: Are these in a specific order intentionally?  If
     not, I think it'd be more pleasing to the eye and easier to
     reference if they were listed in asciiebtical order.

  lines 177-183: so users will have to take care to always use sep, etc.
      just in case multi-valued attribute values contain spaces?

  lines 210ff: I wonder if it's worth mentioning that leading '/' on
      paths are ignored so I'm assuming transforms don't have to worry
      about leading vs. no leading '/' ?


src/tests/cli/t_pkgmogrify.py:
  lines 76-110: Does transformation work on an action with unicode?

  line 200: s/specifeid/specified/

src/util/publish/pkgmogrify.py:
  line 315: duplicate of line 314?

  line 340: action.hash is only valid for file, license, signature.
      should this use the roughly the same logic as action.key, others
      to handle notfound?

  line 378: if it's always "pkg", why not make this a class atribute
      instead?  I think it will override the inherited one.

Cheers,
-Shawn
_______________________________________________
pkg-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss

Reply via email to