David, Thanks for your feedback!
I will make all the changes you suggested, and the changes suggested by Shawn on June 10th, and I'll post another webrev. Answers to your questions are below. [email protected] wrote: > Lines 102-126 - I'm a bit confused whether or not SSX runs on 2009.06 > or not. I thought the checklist said a later release was required but > your email also stated Our management decided that supporting 2009.06 was not a requirement. I'll use the new names for the dependencies. > Line 226 - Based on the summary, what exactly is the contents of this > package? What is the purpose of the copies of the libraries? These libraries (eg libCstd.so.1) are delivered bundled with every express release of Solaris Studio because we don't release a complete set of fresh patches for express releases. For FCS releases, we tell users they need to get all the latest patches when they get new compilers. The internal copies of the libraries are used by the express compilers (via RPATH) to override their /usr/lib counterparts. Note: It's important for our QA and sustaining functions that the OpenSolaris configuration exactly match the files we deliver on Solaris 10, so we can't really tweak them to be different for OpenSolaris. > Line 329 - What exactly is delivered by this package? Are they legal > files delivered into the file system as with other unbundled packages? > Please confirm that each SVR4 package still will include its own > corresponding copyright and license information contained within the > SVR4 copyright file. Each SVR4 package will contain it's own copyright. This package only delivers legal files onto the file system. > Line 385 - Did you mean to exclude studio-netbeans from the > incorporation? If so, why? That's a bug. I'll fix it. _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
