On 11/08/10 01:43, Jan Hnatek wrote:
When I use the update with --be-name, isn't it enough to assume that I expect a new BE to be created, wdyt? This way the option is ignored. I'm not sure now if I didn't overlook that, but a warning about this would be nice.
Hmmm... We've had debates on this ourselves... not clear whether --be-name should mean "if you need a new BE, use this name" vs "I think you need a new BE, so use this". - Bart -- Bart Smaalders Solaris Kernel Performance [email protected] http://blogs.sun.com/barts "You will contribute more with mercurial than with thunderbird." _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
