On 01/20/11 11:39 AM, Shawn Walker wrote:
On 01/14/11 04:18 PM, Danek Duvall wrote:
Shawn Walker wrote:
Greetings,
The following webrev contains changes for the following issues:
17710 matching version class parsing fails if build version is omitted
16624 pkg(5) should document that leading zeros are illegal in fmris
17711 pkg(5) fmri syntax vague and missing information about optional
components
webrev:
http://cr.opensolaris.org/~swalker/pkg-17710/
pkg.5.txt:
- line 55: The added text was what was supposed to have been covered by
saying "following the comma" in the first sentence of the paragraph.
That ma not be sufficiently clear, but we now talk about a comma twice
when we shouldn't have to. Perhaps something like this would be
better:
The second part, which if present must follow a comma, is
the build version, ...
Same goes for the branch and timestamp, obviously.
- Since you say at one point that "pkg:/" is required if a publisher
prefix is not present, you should temper that elsewhere by talking
about how package stems are actually treated.
Okay, I've made some changes based on the above and fixed a few other
small bits:
http://cr.opensolaris.org/~swalker/pkg-17710-1-2/
Any further comments?
-Shawn
_______________________________________________
pkg-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
