Thanks Danek, that indeed does let me update SUNW0punchin which was my aim in the beginning.
Will I be needing to uninstall all my other non compliant pkgs before I can update to snv_160 once that is available ?? -George On 24/02/2011 19:39, Danek Duvall wrote:
[email protected] wrote:Ouch that will require me to uninstall all of our VPNs so that won't happen, I work from home. 4 packages deliver 'dir group=bin mode=0755 owner=root path=usr': ... pkg://software-packages.org/vpn/[email protected],5.11-0.134:20100701T210505Z pkg://software-packages.org/vpn/[email protected],5.11-0.134:20100701T185150Z 1 package delivers 'dir group=sys mode=0755 owner=root path=usr/share/applications': pkg://punchin/[email protected],5.11-1:20101124T135926Z 83 packages deliver 'dir group=other mode=0755 owner=root path=usr/share/applications', including:You could always pkgrecv (all) the broken packages, fix them up, and republish them to a local publisher, until their owners have fixed the problems. The fix I have for the problem is really simple, though, and you can apply it yourself: - as root, edit /usr/lib/python2.6/vendor-packages/pkg/client/imageplan.py - line 808 should read: if not nproblems: - change it to read: if not nproblems or len(actions)<= len(oactions): and try your removals again. That should, I think, even let you upgrade to the latest version of SUNW0punchin, which has a fix for this particular problem. Danek
_______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
