Danek Duvall wrote:
> Brock Pytlik wrote:
>
> > generic.py:
> > I think I sort of understand why you needed to do this, put could
> > you add some comments to the NSG.__new__ function?
>
> Good idea. I discovered a bug writing the comments. I've copied the
> function here.
Shawn asked some questions that seemed like they could be cleared up by
even more comments. I added the sentence
This is a convenience for classes which are the sole members of their
group and don't want to hardcode something arbitrary and unique.
to the end of the NSG class docstring, and changed the last sentence of the
comment preceding namespace_group in Action to read
As a convenience to the classes which are the sole members of their
group, this is set to a non-None value for subclasses by the NSG
metaclass.
Hopefully that's enough to tell someone what's going on here.
Thanks,
Danek
_______________________________________________
pkg-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
