On 12/09/11 15:15, Brock Pytlik wrote:
On 12/08/11 18:41, Tim Foster wrote:
[snip]
line 870 - similarly, array indices are hard to deal with
l[0][2]?(l[0][2] corresponds to t[4] from line 846, right?)
Yep. The l[0] I can't do anything about, that's the first item of a
list. I'll see what named tuples offer here as well.
Actually, there isn't much I can do here because I want to keep
group_by_variant_combinations agnostic about what it's grouping. That
basically means that the [2] is here to stay.
And actually, the changes for adding the named tuple in at 846 were
tiny, so while I'm happy to post another webrev, unless someone asks for
one, I plan to putback once the docstring for
group_by_variant_combinations is resolved.
Brock
[snip]
Brock
cheers,
tim
_______________________________________________
pkg-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
_______________________________________________
pkg-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
