On 07/23/2012 03:13 PM, Edward Pilatowicz wrote:
i think that if we suite generated the two reports (one for the shipping
code and one for the test suite) that'd be ideal. anyone doing work
could easily check if they've changed the coverage of the test suite
substantially. as for hudson i think we'd just want to display code
coverage for the shipping code since in the end that's the most
important.
ed
https://cr.opensolaris.org/action/browse/pkg/dvadovsz/7185359_v2/webrev/
This outputs two separate reports for proto and tests coverage. I also
added a parameter to -c to specify xml or html reporting for coverage.
There's an interesting snag in displaying coverage for for tests/api
where Hudosn instead shows you a page telling you how to use it's own
Remote API. I'm still trying to figure out how to disable this "feature".
Dave
--
Dave Vadovszki
(303)272-2686
500 Eldorado Blvd., Bldg.5
Broomfield, CO US 80021
_______________________________________________
pkg-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
