On lun, 2008-12-15 at 21:50 +0000, [email protected] wrote: > Author: corsac > Date: Mon Dec 15 21:50:20 2008 > New Revision: 1106 > > URL: http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-evolution/?sc=1&rev=1106 > Log: > * New upstream release.
As you have noticed, I've prepared the packaging (based on the Ubuntu one at some times) for evolution 2.24, and thus packaged new gtkhtml and new eds. I had issues with rpath on the three packages, “solved” in eds and gtkhtml by using chrpath, and relibtoolizing in evolution. The relibtoolize is done at build time in evo, using a nice tips from Julien Cristau to run autoreconf in debian/rules. But this trick doesn't work on eds: http://paste.debian.net/23737 I'm not really^Wat all an autotools expert, so if someone could have a look at this issue it'd be very nice. At the same time, if someone could review the changes I made, I'm not a gnome packager expert, especially with such a release. I've followed some changes made by Ubuntu, dropped and created some binary packages where it was needed, but I'm not 100% sure. In the same vein, why are all the lib packages not named like recommended (libetrouc-42-1 and not libetrouc42-1, for example). For the new binary packages I had to create I followed the existing scheme (libebackend1.2-0) so it's consistent, but why not using the “correct” stuff, instead of providing (abusing) lintian overrides? Ok, anyway you should be able to build the three packages, and I would really love some review before any upload to experimental. Cheers, -- Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Pkg-evolution-maintainers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-evolution-maintainers
