On Fri, 24 Apr 2009, Valentin Haenel wrote:
> indeed, however i still have an unresolved segfault that stops me from doing
> this. (see previous mail)
yeah -- I saw you mentioned segfault, but didn't see any details on what
is actually happening ;) you might like to debug the beast: strace,
ltrace, gdb and valgrind are your best friends in this case ;)



> > as for upstream -- did you mean us? or libsvm?
> Yeah, i meant you guys. Not sure if i should wait until the patch becomes
> applied, and then send a new patch, or if i should just interactively rebase 
> the
> existing one to squash the bug fix, and then send the new version.
since you didn't yet push your changes anywhere you indeed might simply
do evil rebases until you think you are done.  It might be worth
considering using topgit [1] to take care about such feature-branches...
?

[1] http://repo.or.cz/w/topgit.git
-- 
Yaroslav Halchenko
Research Assistant, Psychology Department, Rutgers-Newark
Student  Ph.D. @ CS Dept. NJIT
Office: (973) 353-1412 | FWD: 82823 | Fax: (973) 353-1171
        101 Warren Str, Smith Hall, Rm 4-105, Newark NJ 07102
WWW:     http://www.linkedin.com/in/yarik        

_______________________________________________
Pkg-ExpPsy-PyMVPA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-exppsy-pymvpa

Reply via email to