On Thu, 11 Mar 2010, Fabian Pedregosa wrote:
> It is true that I achieved better performance, but at the long run
> I'm a bit concerned on maintainability, i.e. what will happen when
> libsvm makes a new release.
So far, we haven't observed any major API changes in libsvm -- they
seems to simply maintain it -- not much of new development goes into it
> Every binding I've seen has this problem, so in the long run I'm
> pretty sure that either libsvm will have to change their API, either
> a new svm library with a better API will take up its place.
do you mean shogun may be? ;)
--
.-.
=------------------------------ /v\ ----------------------------=
Keep in touch // \\ (yoh@|www.)onerussian.com
Yaroslav Halchenko /( )\ ICQ#: 60653192
Linux User ^^-^^ [175555]
_______________________________________________
Pkg-ExpPsy-PyMVPA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-exppsy-pymvpa
