On Sat, 22 May 2010 13:31:13 +0200 Sebastian Reichel <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 11:20:58AM +0200, Visti Andresen wrote: > > > > Which brings me to the question "Is anyone working on packaging > > libeflvala?" > > I planned to do so, but I did no work so far, so I'm happy if you do > the work :) Ok, I will see if I can get it done this weekend. > > > If no, then I have two additional questions: > > > > What should the package be called? > > ---------------------------------- > > I would have called it 'efl-vala'. This fits to 'gupnp-vala' and > 'efl-dev'. I suppose it is settled then, efl-vala it is :) > > > Package version number? > > ----------------------- > > Any preferences/best practice hints? > > fso-frameworkd has real versions (which is the 0.9.5.9 part), but we > switch to revisions between two version, thus the +git20100131 part. > > > Now that I answered your questions some more comments: > > You want to package [1] and not the stuff from git.fso.org! Apart > from this there is a version number: 0.5.0 (check configure.ac) As long as I am using a git version i suppose that I should suffix the 0.5.0 with a .something and the git revision? (As there might be more than one git revision with the same version.major.minor number) Thank you very much indeed, a most helpful set of comments > > -- Sebastian > > [1] http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/browser/trunk/BINDINGS/vala _______________________________________________ pkg-fso-maint mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-fso-maint
