On Sun, Aug 19, 2007 at 03:12:33AM +0200, Miriam Ruiz wrote: > > The link refers to GPL version 2 which makes sense for me. But not to > > specify the version seems just wrong. > > You're right, it might be better to specify the version.
Better indeed, but not required. From the GPL (version 2):
Each version is given a distinguishing version number. If the
Program specifies a version number of this License which applies
to it and "any later version", you have the option of following
the terms and conditions either of that version or of any later
version published by the Free Software Foundation. If the
Program does not specify a version number of this License, you
may choose any version ever published by the Free Software
Foundation.
Which means you are free to choose to accept only version 2 and later,
and distribute it as such. When doing that, you should of course change
the headers to reflect this choice.
Thanks,
Bas Wijnen
--
I encourage people to send encrypted e-mail (see http://www.gnupg.org).
If you have problems reading my e-mail, use a better reader.
Please send the central message of e-mails as plain text
in the message body, not as HTML and definitely not as MS Word.
Please do not use the MS Word format for attachments either.
For more information, see http://pcbcn10.phys.rug.nl/e-mail.html
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Pkg-games-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-games-devel
