That’s a fair point as well. Do you want to file a bug against the package in question?
On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 9:11 PM, Paul Tagliamonte <paul...@debian.org> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 03:07:36PM -0400, Alexandre Viau wrote: >> About that, should -dev packages contain binaries? Would it be best that >> dev packages stay arch:all and ship their binaries in a separated package? > > I tend to say "yes" - the -dev files aren't arch dependent, and shipping > the binary like that prevents it from being multiarch'd approprately, > which is a massive pain for anyone using it for 32 and 64 bit build on > the same host. Which is nearly no one, sure, but the point stands. > > I'd be for shipping a binary seprately, like -tools or -bin for C > libraries. > > Cheers, > Paul -- Best regards, Michael _______________________________________________ Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers