I don't have a pony in this race, but here are my unsolicited thoughts:
> > I'm really curious about why "0.5.2~ds1-1" was switched to > > "0.5.2+dfsg-1" -- can you elaborate on the reasoning behind the > > change? > > Perhaps that is a silly change as I only have two minor reasons for that: > > * elimination of "~" from version. "~" is not tag friendly. > ~ is meaningful to debian versions. Changing it because of the format the source package is stored in seems wrong at best. ~ seems to be a fine relation to use, + implies something else. > > * I could not recall (or find) what "ds" stands for. "dfsg" is > non-ambiguous > and apparently more traditional. Besides I don't like to use my initials in > version. ;) > "debian source". It's used when you repack for non-DFSG reasons. DFSG (+dfsg or ~dfsg) repacks are when something violates the DFSG and you need to repack it. > I hope you don't mind. I shall be happy to revert if my changes are not in > line with your preferences. > > -- > Best wishes, > Dmitry Smirnov. > Cheers, Paul > > --- > > Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. > -- Philip K. Dick > > _______________________________________________ > Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list > Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers > -- :wq
_______________________________________________ Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers