* Michael Hudson-Doyle: > There is another approach to the static linking issue, which is to > start using dynamic linking instead. It's implemented upstream for > most architectures now (only mips64 le/be and ppc64 be missing I > think). I'm going to be working on starting to use dynamic linking > during the next cycle of Ubuntu development, and I'd certainly be > interested in getting it going for Debian too. (the timeframes re: > stretch release look reasonable for this).
Can you explain a bit more how dynamic linking would help us to determine what we need to rebuild? I expect that dynamic linking will complicate matters because we will have to rebuild library packages in dependency order. I don't see how Go shared objects can provide a stable ABI. _______________________________________________ Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers
