On 15.04.2016 02:10, Dmitry Smirnov wrote: > On Thursday, 14 April 2016 10:38:15 PM AEST Daniel Stender wrote: >> I have an idea but wanted to poll, how could get they both in the best way? > > Not sure for "best way" but here some ideas how this problem could be > addressed: > > Sometimes one dependency required only by tests. In such case it may be safe > to disable corresponding tests in order to break/remove circular dependency. > > Since Packer appears to be a bigger package it is likely that you are > packaging "winrmcp" merely to satisfy dependency of Packer. There are two > options: > > * To keep bundled/vendored version of "winrmcp" in Packer and do not package > "winrmcp" separately; > > * To keep bundled/vendored portion of Packer code in "winrmcp". > > I would investigate those options in given order. Whatever you choose please > remember to leave a note explaining your decision in README.source.
Hi Dmitry, thx for comments. Yes, vendoring would be another option. I'll see. Best, Daniel -- 4096R/DF5182C8 http://www.danielstender.com/blog/ _______________________________________________ Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers