On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 07:04:13PM +0200, alex bodnaru wrote: > hi, > > python-gtkextra is perfectly installable on testing, but it is alleged > to have a policy problem. since it's last upload has been nmu by qa > team, there should be no problem to do it again. >
Indeed, it has been removed from archive, both in testing and sid as well. http://packages.qa.debian.org/p/python-gtkextra/news/20051008T184926Z.html > since openev still depends on python-gtkextra, it should be adopted by > some sponsor and uploaded to unstable, so that there will be some > dependency on python-gtkextra. > Before that, python-gtkextra should be re-uploaded from scratch. Do you have any pointer to the policy problem you mentioned? > as for the new libgdal, rebuilding openev should do. > No, at least it does not use gdal-config, so fails configuring due to wrong libname. -- Francesco P. Lovergine _______________________________________________ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel