On 01/13/2014 11:26 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 09:13:39PM +0100, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >>> Just as a side note I use git-buildpackage for all packages in d-gis tree. >> >> Further investigation shows that a missing --pristine-tar was not the cause. >> >> My commit of the new upstream version deleted the .gitignore file, while >> it is included in the upstream tarball and not touched by the repacking. >> >> http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-grass/gdal.git;a=commitdiff;h=864bb9ee6237551dc25377be642bf59cb6c48644 >> >> Adding the .gitignore file back to the upstream branch makes the >> pristine-tar checkout tarball identical to the one in the archive. > > I have checked out the original source via `apt-get source gdal` and > I get: > > $ md5sum gdal_1.10.1+dfsg.orig.tar.gz > 65f908560558b4801daa6946e52a03a6 gdal_1.10.1+dfsg.orig.tar.gz > > > If I'm using the pristine-tar from the git repository I get: > > $ md5sum gdal_1.10.1+dfsg.orig.tar.gz > d4960006e29570a8e5c0c8824f7c725c gdal_1.10.1+dfsg.orig.tar.gz > > > (File size is different as well.) > > So something remains wrong here.
Correct. I was comparing the wrong file, and rejoiced prematurely. This looked good, but wasn't the orig.tar.gz checked out by pristine-tar, that lived in /tmp :( 65f908560558b4801daa6946e52a03a6 gdal_1.10.1+dfsg.orig.tar.gz 65f908560558b4801daa6946e52a03a6 gdal_1.10.1+dfsg.orig.tar.gz.archive d4960006e29570a8e5c0c8824f7c725c gdal_1.10.1+dfsg.orig.tar.gz.pristine I've commited the orig.tar.gz from the archive in the pristine-tar branch, checking that out does work. Kind Regards, Bas -- GnuPG: 0xE88D4AF1 (new) / 0x77A975AD (old) _______________________________________________ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel