Bas, I took some time reviewing your changes to the postgis package.
Thanks again for assembling a new tarball and incorporating the translations. For pgapt, it's beneficial if you do not change the release to "unstable" until you really intend to release. Because there, we have special logic that automatically creates increasing ~git-$REVID revision numbers. I admittedly didn't know cme, and I'm willing to learn. However, it a) made reviewing a lot harder than necessary and b) broke things. Please do such reformatting only after modifications have settled and other maintainers agree to the change. So as to prevent conflicts with other's work and ease review. That change hides an increase in the required gdal version, which broke wheezy, saucy and precise on pgapt. As I couldn't immediately figure out how to let cme only do the reformatting (or do anything useful at all), I had a pretty hard time comparing the two control files. In the end, I simply reverted to the last known-working version and manually re-added (hopefully) all of the required and good changes, manually. (In addition, I don't like the uneven indentation with so many spaces... looks weird IMO. But again, feel free to raise arguments for using cme.) Why did you add the lintian override? The warning seems perfectly appropriate to me. It's a debconf template and we should make it translatable, somehow. I've just been lazy and couldn't figure out how to do that, yet. Reverted as well. I triggered another build on pgapt with the control file reverted and hope to see more green, again. Oh, and BTW, given it's a new source tarball, I'm not sure I can do the upload. I'm just a DM. But getting this sponsored shouldn't be an issue. Thanks again for contributing to the postgis package. Regards Markus
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel