Your message dated Sun, 25 Oct 2015 19:46:19 +0100 with message-id <562d237b.3060...@xs4all.nl> and subject line Re: Bug#802960: gdal-bin executables malloc.c.. has caused the Debian Bug report #802960, regarding gdal-bin executables malloc.c.. to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 802960: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=802960 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---Package: gdal-bin Version: 1.11.3+dfsg-2 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, * What led up to the situation? Running the binaries * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or ineffective)? * What was the outcome of this action? When i wanted to run the binaries from the gdal-bin package, I've got the same error for each binary: gdal_contour: malloc.c:2372: sysmalloc: Assertion `(old_top == (((mbinptr) (((char *) &((av)->bins[((1) - 1) * 2])) - __builtin_offsetof (struct malloc_chunk, fd)))) && old_size == 0) || ((unsigned long) (old_size) >= (unsigned long)((((__builtin_offsetof (struct malloc_chunk, fd_nextsize))+((2 *(sizeof(size_t))) - 1)) & ~((2 *(sizeof(size_t))) - 1))) && ((old_top)->size & 0x1) && ((unsigned long) old_end & pagemask) == 0)' failed. Félbeszakítva The list of affected binaries: gdal_contour: malloc.c:2372: sysmalloc: Assertion... gdal_grid: malloc.c:2372: sysmalloc: Assertion... gdal_rasterize: malloc.c:2372: sysmalloc: Assertion... gdal_translate: malloc.c:2372: sysmalloc: Assertion... gdaladdo: malloc.c:2372: sysmalloc: Assertion... gdalbuildvrt: malloc.c:2372: sysmalloc: Assertion... gdaldem: OK gdalenhance: malloc.c:2372: sysmalloc: Assertion... gdalinfo: malloc.c:2372: sysmalloc: Assertion... gdallocationinfo: malloc.c:2372: sysmalloc: Assertion... gdalmanage: malloc.c:2372: sysmalloc: Assertion... gdalserver: malloc.c:2372: sysmalloc: Assertion... gdalsrsinfo: malloc.c:2372: sysmalloc: Assertion... gdaltindex: malloc.c:2372: sysmalloc: Assertion... gdaltransform: malloc.c:2372: sysmalloc: Assertion... gdalwarp: malloc.c:2372: sysmalloc: Assertion... nearblack: malloc.c:2372: sysmalloc: Assertion... ogr2ogr: OK ogrinfo: OK ogrlineref: OK ogrtindex: OK testepsg: OK If i uninstall the libgdal-grass driver, the results is: *** Error in `gdal_translate': malloc(): memory corruption: 0x0000000000d7d2c0 *** I have rebuilt gdal on my machine, but nothing changed, i've got the same error, then from upstream with minimal drivers, and everything was ok. * What outcome did you expect instead? :) -- System Information: Debian Release: stretch/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 4.2.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=hu_HU.utf8, LC_CTYPE=hu_HU.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) Versions of packages gdal-bin depends on: ii libc6 2.19-22 ii libgcc1 1:5.2.1-22 ii libgdal1i [libgdal.so.1-1.11.3] 1.11.3+dfsg-2 ii libstdc++6 5.2.1-22 gdal-bin recommends no packages. Versions of packages gdal-bin suggests: ii python-gdal 1.11.3+dfsg-2
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --------BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 notfound 802960 gdal/1.11.3+dfsg-2 thanks Hi Antal, On 25-10-15 19:41, KOSZA Antal wrote: >> The issues seems limited to your environment, you may not have >> upgraded all packages involved in the recent transition to GDAL >> 1.11.3. >> >> Can you verify that you're using the Debian packages from >> unstable and not have any local customizations or 3rd party >> repositories causing this issue? > > The cause was an old mrsid and ecw driver in gdalplugins from the > 1.11.2 version. Thanks to valgrind. Again thank you for your > promptitude. Thanks for confirming it's a local issue. Kind Regards, Bas - -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJWLSNzAAoJEGdQ8QrojUrxzwcQAJBv+qREYmw4FJoJx4GGnQBH ykWebMcnT8K/aDO1KqclOpcj+B2ypXLTPIpPZxmTu/qlHrMbgWEpR3dJ+H5Pq3wW 5xlFeHUMty/ttevFDDYuvcMSE/i2nP+0gEWLu1+ESUnkBJh6TdQq09WzoPqXTq1M 2NBegW6MHlumlezXVlirP2xc6FUJ1JcmXOHVI1URKVRh/hdwDOUisNfpgw2Q7m+8 L2aBWXeJ5sZKgFqPZjA91YoK8MrHrts/QuF3Y2MTugWnSQewH1eq5bx9odYvBxzE 2NuuZkd/jfCSbuAI51GoDAJ6C694Ibr7sG012oxjt6puRx5Zz0h6WlYKgu89XlB0 +tndeFE+xcT4GpR/VD4o2zkOA2oCODh28KqlIF2a3JZDL6Id9Q7MZ6OKmmWDtIX0 DKkj09riAD0EfCuDAa/XIKRryDHzU9wHfJnPUoVA6LDbRsgmXweK43D2Je5DV4Qp XF2B+Pg49a1A72E0IyBbYiZ5da/OXKWCKQ0rwyVCgoonSGpiElr+fvpNxZ+8URW7 0klNzGJJ0T7ZiyUbdI8+uyq5miHjTBHRViTvlmqcuR2PDvcZBAUiKG5zSXjdhtO9 PF9vUTSKww5d/sWDkRS1ykglyU+fM6Ff9rriz7TlIWvqLdfkgogSe5VaEPoPfpFV AZq3IeOE1KXYuT2CVbOU =7eTt -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
