Instead of updating individual libraries, maybe the easiest would be to upgrade the package set to stackage LTS 10 (which features pandoc-2.0.6). Is there a way to help there?
On 2018-01-08 11:30+0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Hi Philipp, > > Quoting Philipp Huebner (2018-01-08 09:46:44) >> a quick question for the uploaders of pandoc: >> do you have any plans regarding the packaging of pandoc 2.0.X ? > > Excellent question. > > For starters, we will need updates for the following Haskell libraries: > > * texmath >= 0.10 && < 0.11 > * pandoc-types >= 1.17.3 && < 1.18 > * skylighting >= 0.5.1 && < 0.6 > * hslua >= 0.9.5 && < 0.10 > > ...and these Haskell libraries now missing needs to be packaged: > > * hslua-module-text >= 0.1.2 && < 0.2 > * cmark-gfm >= 0.1.1 && < 0.2 > > I would appreciate if someone other than me in the team could package > those. Or tell me if problematic, then I can investiate if restrictions > in Pandoc can be relaxed via patches. > > When above is done, I intend to package Pandoc 2.x targeted > experimental, and file bugreports against reverse dependencies to have > them tested for regressions. > > then we can consider if possible to simply have the pandoc package > upgraded to 2.x or we need to introduce a new pandoc2 package (if that > is possible at all - I suspect the dependencies e.g. on pandoc-types may > diverge too much). > > - Jonas
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Pkg-haskell-maintainers mailing list Pkg-haskell-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-haskell-maintainers