Am Freitag, dem 07.01.2022 um 01:00 +0000 schrieb Thorsten Alteholz: > > Hi Markus, > > I am bit stuck. LICENSE contains some remarks that third party stuff is added > to this package. > > I can find text that was taken from the ODF spec (in [1]), so this copyright > information is missing in any case.
Those messages are part of a specification but the copyright of the file is Apache 2.0. This is like using <h1></h1> tags in a document, or printing a novel on DIN A4 sized paper. The tags are part of the HTML language specification but the document can be licensed under a different copyright. > But where can I find the MathML-, the MSV- and this isorelax-stuff? A comment > about this in your debian/copyright would be great. Ah, I can see where the confusion stems from. I have cloned the complete repository from https://github.com/tdf/odftoolkit but I did only package https://github.com/tdf/odftoolkit/tree/master/odfdom as the Source link states correctly in debian/copyright. The LICENSE in the root directory is the license file from the complete odftoolkit repository. The relevant LICENSE file is in the odfdom directory. I did not package ODF Validator and none of the dependencies which are mentioned in the LICENSE file are included in this package. I have clarified this with a comment in d/c. The whole libodfdom-java source package is under the Apache 2.0 license. Regards, Markus
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
__ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team <https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers>. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
