Hello,

On 2022-01-06 11:04, Andrius Merkys wrote:
> I have just uploaded xom v1.3.7 to experimental and pushed the packaging
> to a branch. Test-rebuild with ratt of 137 was successful except for
> RC-buggy packages plus the following ones:

I have uploaded xom_1.3.7+ds-2 to experimental, fixing resurfaced
#970723. It seems this upload has fixed the remaining problems:

> * starjava-ttools_3.4-2: not sure if xom-related, will sort out in
> experimental

No longer fails with xom_1.3.7+ds-2.

> * libeuclid-java_1.6-1: new upstream release uploaded, upstream
> mentioned updating to xom v1.3.*, will check in experimental

Uploaded libeuclid-java_2.0-1 to unstable, builds with xom_1.3.7+ds-2.

> * cifxom_1.5+git20211217.ca2412c-1: not sure if xom-related, will sort
> it out in experimental

No longer fails with xom_1.3.7+ds-2.

> * cmlxom_3.5-1: new upstream release is out, upstream mentioned updating
> to xom v1.3.*, will check in experimental

Uploaded cmlxom_4.0-1 to unstable, builds with xom_1.3.7+ds-2.

> * diffoscope_198: not enough disk space to rebuild locally, will look
> for another machine.

Does not fail with xom_1.3.7+ds-2.

> After sorting these out I will upload xom v1.3.7 to unstable, unless
> there are objections, of course.

This is my plan after the weekend.

Andrius

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
<https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers>.
 Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Reply via email to