> No, its enough to rebuild the package with the new gcc package pointing
> to gcc-4.1 installed.

Sure, but relying on (build-essential + libgcj-dev) assumes that the gcc
and gcj versions will always be the same.  Past experience has suggested
this is not the case, which is why I've leaned towards java-gcj-compat-dev
instead.

b.



_______________________________________________
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers

Reply via email to