On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 06:07:43PM +0200, Manuel Prinz wrote: > Dear Debian Java Maintainers, > > I'd like to join the the Debian Java Maintainers group and contribute my > packages [1,2]. My Alioth username is hauro-guest. It would be nice if > you could add me to the team. > > My packages are almost ready for review but there are some questions > unanswered to me. I hope you can help me out here! > > 1. Is there any progress with java.util.Scanner in gcj? (See [3].) On of > my packages would compile with ecj if java.util.Scanner is available. At > present, it has to go to contib because of that.
Nope, currently no progress on this. Some person from a university in vienna wanted to contribute this but never did, afaik. > 2. What needs to be done to build a package with Sun's JDK under > pbuilder? I don't know how to tell pbuilder to auto-accept the EULA. I > think there was a post on that but I'm unable to find the information on > the web. What I did is that I have an extra pbuilder base tgz for builds with SUN JDK. I installed SUN JDK in it manually by pbuilder --save-after-login login Its not nice but works easily. > 3. I currently split the jFFTW package [1] into an -java and -jni > package. But the packages are rather small and I thought about combining > them. Doing so gave some weird lintian warnings. Is a small package a > blocker or would it be ok to have a ~20k package? Looking at the pure sizes it doesnt make sense IMO to put it into separate packges. -java is arch:all, -jni is arch:any. A combined package is arch:any. It needs to be thought about this, but I think its okay. In general FTP-Master dont likes too small binary packages. Cheers, Michael _______________________________________________ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
