Bob Black schrieb: > On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 07:14:38AM +0100, Dalibor Topic wrote: > >> Bob Black wrote: >> >>> Will classpath .95 (or .96) be packaged for arm, or is it basically >>> armel only going forward? >>> >>> >>> >> It's packaged for arm, but it doesn't build: >> >> http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=classpath;ver=2%3A0.96.1-1;arch=arm;stamp=1200397843 >> > > Ah, ok. > > >> classpath depends on ecj, which depends on gcj, which in turn depends on >> ecj to build, and since there is no gcj-4.2 build for arm, the circularity >> at the end of the chain is killing the builds. >> > > I clicked around packages.debian.org looking at the various deps and > it seemed there were (up to date) arm builds for the ones i looked at. > > Looking at gcj-4.2's pool dir (sorted by date): > http://http.us.debian.org/debian/pool/main/g/gcj-4.2/?C=M;O=A > > I see various* _arm.deb files dated Jan 18 > > That's a couple days after the date on the buildd log from above. > > Any chance the build just needs to be retried? > > That's possible. I've just installed and built classpath on sid arm manually today using ecj, so it seems to be possible now, and may just need a friendly nudge to the buildd.
cheers, dalibor topic _______________________________________________ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
