Your message dated Sun, 18 Oct 2009 19:50:59 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line kaffe has been removed from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #362769,
regarding kaffe-pthreads: do not depend on gjdoc
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
362769: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=362769
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: kaffe-pthreads
Version: 1.1.6.91-2
Severity: wishlist
Refering to #328648 I would like to ask whether using gjdoc in the
Depends is *really* necessary.
Quoting #328648:
| So, while it is technically possible to loosen the dependency on
| gjdoc, it is neither feasible nor advisable. The number of
| important and grave bugs the kaffe package would recieve would be
| significant, since users expect javadoc and the other standard
| Java(TM) command facilities to work as expected.
Why not add gjdoc to Recommends (which is handled nearly as depends
by some frontends) and use a solution like perldoc does:
#!/bin/sh
# place-holder, diverted by perl-doc
echo You need to install the perl-doc package to use this program.
exit 1
I would really appreciate if I don't have to install gjdoc if I only
want to use kaffe[-pthreads] itself.
regards,
-mika-
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
That means that bugs won't get fixed anymore.
Torsten
--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
