-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 2010-10-09 18:26, Guillaume Mazoyer wrote: > So, I guess we should stick with the second patch I proposed and not the > last one. Is the patch correct? Does it need more work? > >
Hey I have applied your patch to our SVN. I see you have added yourself to uploaders, but I do not see you as a member of the pkg-java team. Have you considered joining the team? It would allow you to commit changes yourself :) You can read more about the Java Team from [1]. I made a few changes to your second patch and I have attached the difference between your original changes and the actual changes committed. I have not proceeded with finishing the upload, since we are late in the Squeeze Freeze. Thanks for your interest and your patient reminders, ~Niels [1] http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/JavaPackaging -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJMsuH+AAoJEAVLu599gGRC/AoP/3Tndq3yZVPVGK8A2NV4ZY/C sSruWrPeF9A0CRidWEHdxGH0coCdJUG1hEVIHBz/ph7kAWwylm/620WycdpGMfWe Ad9zHeVViQVt4n42qaEEOY/e7IdI7hpZ/M/fPCpPVXmmt2YbfIKTZPDQEr6nIUfD F/3MNoF4S3GV9DJDorJUBDKgDsUbaeJZC9S3ARc/LaiNqiI21ML4mUrk58hrSM7W SEC8fNj9wmRnvuDNELEMS7LBnSH4GtVY3rMlBshwoyxpkLUyE7ImqwlrZ4CIjggj g4Y6L8HH3XE10nglXCYlvAu9x/K5LweyLdzgRPEarTDWgbB1s1OQPBAdVgtKUjxJ XtQZ/60YPEmxm7mDU6TyvBbDinmgVqSEuq8GAY8wziY6CFE0j+DlVIWUKEjeyo89 aOAnxUzrY6xolTBQYUuLrQ8pWSymOOoOtIW3tWQmf8DlD5SGP8+WDTNzEW7c1izh SFAiLQs+Y78RSfd1H7ZvChZbxQzjQrm8cLpQfLx95gmOVLQ+sm4jnqtik3ALwGFB cFUEsJhD4p4hu7WjQSuAxBkzR6F5QCrSJJQPgW4al9mMByO1eoS58Ljgb2wEBEQL 4b7BgyKb3NuhrMJ/3lWIPX0pAend2Xv6qXEBWabO6nxRhtfJ+rufaZqEiwir1jLv Q6obDSBsQRSepzI4ioWX =zwnG -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
diff -u debian/changelog debian/changelog
--- debian/changelog 2010-09-18 11:56:21.919887814 +0200
+++ debian/changelog (working copy)
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-java-gnome (4.0.16-1) unstable; urgency=low
+java-gnome (4.0.16-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
* New upstream release.
* debian/control
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
- Make sure the installed JNI package is always compatible with the package
which provides the JAR.
- libjava-gnome-java does not need to depends on a JRE.
+ - Bumped Standards-Version to 3.9.1.
* debian/copyright
- Update copyright to 2010.
diff -u debian/control debian/control
--- debian/control 2010-09-18 12:55:37.900909003 +0200
+++ debian/control (working copy)
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers <[email protected]>
Uploaders: Manu Mahajan <[email protected]>, Onkar Shinde <[email protected]>, Guillaume Mazoyer <[email protected]>
Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 5), cdbs, default-jdk, junit, libglib2.0-dev (>= 2.22), libgtk2.0-dev (>= 2.18), libpango1.0-dev (>= 1.22), libgtksourceview2.0-dev (>= 2.6.1), libnotify-dev (>= 0.4.5), libgtkspell-dev (>= 2.0.13), libunique-dev (>= 1.0.8), libglade2-dev, xvfb, xfonts-base, metacity, hicolor-icon-theme
-Standards-Version: 3.9.0
+Standards-Version: 3.9.1
Section: java
Homepage: http://java-gnome.sourceforge.net/
Vcs-Svn: svn://svn.debian.org/svn/pkg-java/trunk/java-gnome
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
Package: libjava-gnome-java
Architecture: all
-Depends: ${misc:Depends}, libjava-gnome-jni (= ${source:Version})
+Depends: ${misc:Depends}, libjava-gnome-jni (>= ${source:Version})
Description: The java-gnome language bindings project
These are the Java bindings for GTK+ and GNOME! Featuring a robust
engineering design, completely generated internals, a lovingly crafted
java-gnome-commit.diff.sig
Description: Binary data
__ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers>. Please use [email protected] for discussions and questions.
