On 2014-03-19 02:23, Dmitry Smirnov wrote: > Hi Emmanuel, > Hi,
> On Wed, 19 Mar 2014 00:33:50 Emmanuel Bourg wrote: >> I checked the suggested regexp and I confirm it parses properly the >> manifest entries. It's a bit sad to add a dependency on perl just for >> this though. > > Thanks for double-checking my fix. Although I added "perl" to Depends I'm not > too sure if we have to add such explicit dependency since Perl is "Priority: > standard" and therefore pretty much always installed. > > I feel comfortable with Perl as dependency. I'm not too comfortable with > "sed" > that is (IMHO) much harder to use not to mention that sometimes it is just > not > sufficient... > > > [...] Why is "perl" needed rather than "perl-base" (which is essential). The patch seems to be using none of the modules from perl or perl-modules ~Niels __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers>. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
