On Sat, 08 Aug 2015 00:55:57 +0200 Christoph Anton Mitterer <cales...@scientia.net> wrote: > Hey. > > Anything new here? That blocks upgrading to to current libstdc++6 > (without removing a large number of packages) and thus also prevents > other packages (that already depend on newer libstdc++6) with important > security updates to be installed. > > Shouldn't the severity been raised, as the package is unistallable? > > Cheers, > Chris
Hi Chris, thanks for the reminder to check on this. I don't see how antlr is affected, given that the only potential issue is with source code that lives in a comment: https://codesearch.debian.net/results/catch.*%3A%3Afailure%20package%3Aantlr/page_0 Therefore, I'm inclined to close the bug as Matthias suggests. Cheers, tony
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
__ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers>. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
