On Tue, 8 Mar 2016 21:36:31 -0500 Michael Gilbert <mgilb...@debian.org> wrote: > > I have switched the build-dependency to default-jdk and changed > > JAVA_HOME in debian/rules accordingly. However the package FTBFS with > > OpenJDK 8. I guess packaging the latest upstream release would be the > > best option. > > 2.9.3 is supposed to support building without ant. I looked at it a > while ago, and it isn't quite that simple. > > lwjgl3 is also available, but it has a huge dependency stack with > almost none of it in Debian yet. > > I have less interest in lwjgl now than I used to, and I may not be > able to find the time to work on it. > > Best wishes, > Mike
I had a quick look at lwjgl3. It seems the API has been declared stable and lwjgl2 will be retired in favor of lwjgl3. I will try to package version 3. There are no reverse-dependencies for lwjgl, so the risk of breaking something is for once quite small. Regards, Markus
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
__ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers>. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
