Am 09.03.2016 um 20:53 schrieb Stephen Nelson:
> 
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 4:03 PM Markus Koschany <a...@debian.org
> <mailto:a...@debian.org>> wrote:
> 
> 
>     This issue is fixed in Git but Stephen Nelson wanted to ask upstream for
>     some license clarifications. Unfortunately we haven't heard back  from
>     him since August 2015.
> 
>     https://lists.debian.org/debian-java/2015/08/msg00029.html
> 
> 
> Hi Markus
> 
> I did contact upstream [1] but they never replied. I'm not a user of the
> software but was trying to keep it in Debian.
> 
> [1] http://forum.vuze.com/Thread-Incompatible-licence-issue

Hi Stephen,

thanks for the link. I would also like to keep Azureus in Debian but I'm
also not a user. We need someone who updates Azureus from time to time
and we need a clarification from upstream. If they are not interested in
making a simple statement about licenses, it's probably not worth the
effort to continue packaging Azureus.

*Just my opinion. Volunteers are always welcome*

Regards,

Markus


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
<http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers>. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Reply via email to