Your message dated Sat, 24 Jun 2017 19:44:51 +0200
with message-id <a7eb0782-ae71-8489-8afa-fe1239d29...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#849464: Can we in fact validate HTML5? No instructions.
has caused the Debian Bug report #849464,
regarding Can we in fact validate HTML5? No instructions.
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
849464: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=849464
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libhtml5parser-java
Version: 1.4+r1.3.1-1

Can we in fact validate HTML5 offline? No instructions.
Please add full instructions.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Tue, 27 Dec 2016 14:42:10 +0100 Markus Koschany <a...@debian.org> wrote:
> On 27.12.2016 14:21, 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson wrote:
> > All I know is
> > 
> > wdg-html-validator_1.6.2-8_all.deb is now obsolete.
> > 
> > So the user does
> > # apt-cache search validator.*HTML5
> > libhtml5parser-java - validator.nu HTML parser implementation in Java
> > libhtml5parser-java-doc - Documentation for libhtml5parser-java
> > 
> > Voila!
> > 
> > But alas he installs the packages only to find there is no way /
> > instructions to do his familiar
> > 
> > $ validate file.html
> > line 335 column 1 - Warning: missing </a> before </p>
> > 
> > So he doesn't know why he downloaded the package.
> 
> I usually read the package description with aptitude show
> libhtml5parser-java and in this case it tells me that the package
> contains a HTML5 parser implementation written in Java. Also the package
> name itself is quite self-explaining, it's a library written in Java.
> Everyone who is not familiar with the terms "parser, HTML5 and Java"
> will probably shy away from it. It is not a drop-in-replacement for
> wdg-html-validator, otherwise I would have mentioned it.
> 
> All in all I consider the package description to be sufficiently
> informative and there is a lot of documentation in libhtml5parser-java-doc.

I am going to close this bug report because I think the description is
informative and there is sufficient documentation in
libhtml5parser-java-doc to use this Java library package.

Regards,

Markus


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
<http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers>. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Reply via email to