2018-06-11 8:59 GMT+02:00 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <po...@debian.org>: > Package: libnode64-dev > Version: 10.4.0~dfsg-1 > Severity: important > > Hi, > > Your shared library package is named libnode64, since it ships > libnode.so.64. > That is fine. However the development package should be named libnode-dev, > so that rdeps build-dep on libnode-dev and when upstream bumps the SONAME, > a binNMU is enough to rebuild them against the new SONAME. Otherwise if > they > build-depend on libnode64-dev, rdeps would need sourceful uploads, making > transitions unnecessarily difficult. > > Besides, libnode64-dev and libnode65-dev would never be co-installable and > would need to conflict against each other, so there's no point in > versioning > them. >
Hi, There is already a libnode-dev package, provided by libnode64-dev. However i don't have any reason to not build only the former. Thank you for that. Jérémy.
-- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
