On 2018, സെപ്റ്റംബർ 24 6:24:50 AM IST, Julien Puydt <julien.pu...@laposte.net> wrote: >Hi, > >Le 23/09/2018 à 16:44, Pirate Praveen a écrit : >> On 9/23/18 5:13 PM, Julien Puydt wrote: >>> What do you think of the attached script? It assumes the upstream >>> DefinitelyTyped tree is in "DefinitelyTyped.upstream" as it's the >layout >>> I use for my experiment, and generates a "control" file and a bunch >of >>> "node-types-*.install" files. >> >> Did you check node-typescript-types source? It just downloads the >> tarballs from npm registry. I think that is a better approach (only >ship >> the definitions we want instead of all) and instead of creating many >> more binary packages, a provides should be sufficient (if at all >required). >> > >Did you see the script was detecting which packages are in Debian, and >only then shipped them? Here I have: > >jpuydt@nox:~/Debian/DefinitelyTyped$ python3 build_control.py >Reading package lists... Done >Building dependency tree >Reading state information... Done >490 node-types-* generated and 4266 not considered
It'd add 490 new binary packages, which I don't think will make ftp masters happy. Even this much is unnecessary I think. Instead of looking at a node package being in Debian as a criteria, I think we can add them only if a package actually build depend on it. >so yes, the source tree has everything, but it's only packaging as >binary the necessary files... > >In my first mail I think proposed to ship what is really often a >*single >file* within each package separately ; that sounds the least complex >(no >need for fancy features in a fakeupstream, no need for a complex script > >to build thousands of packages...). -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
