Le 04/02/2019 à 11:41, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > Quoting Xavier (2019-02-04 11:24:07) >> Le Lundi, Février 04, 2019 06:50 CET, Xavier <y...@debian.org> a écrit: >> >>> Le 02/02/2019 à 12:11, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : >>>> Quoting Xavier (2019-02-02 11:10:03) >>>>> As jsbeautifier installs just one binary we could simply add >>>>> Breaks/Provides fields in debian/control to close the bug >>>> >>>> Indeed it is just one tiny wheeny little binary. >>>> >>>> Just like "node". >>>> >>>> Please don't! >> >> Little resume of available options : >> - rename binary => bad option >> - diversion => Debian docs says " prefer Conflicts or update-alternatives >> - Conflicts/Provides : works >> - update-alternatives : needs sync with jsbeautifier >> >> Which option do we choose ? > > There's also the option I proposed: Drop the Node.js binary for now. > > No, I am super busy, so I will not debate it now. If you insist that > something else is clever/safe/okay-ish/whatever then do as you please. > > > - Jonas
OK, I added jsbeautifier in recommended dependencies to provide js-beautify, fixed some other things, and pushed package. Cheers, Xavier -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
