Le dim. 8 mars 2020 à 06:04, Pirate Praveen <prav...@onenetbeyond.org> a écrit :
> > > On 2020, മാർച്ച് 7 2:34:17 PM IST, "Jérémy Lal" <kapo...@melix.org> wrote: > >Le sam. 7 mars 2020 à 06:18, Nilesh Patra <npatra...@gmail.com> a écrit > >: > > > >> > >> > >> I think we should start Node.js 12 migration (with rollup, webpack, > >>> gulp,...), this will also fix some RC/FTBFS bugs, should we? > >>> I fixed a lot of failing autopkgtest errors (using [1] list), most > >of > >>> the remaining packages in this list will be fixed by node-iconv > >rebuild. > >>> > >> > >> Agreed. Node-nodedbi is removed from testing, officially now. We can > >file > >> a (RC) bug against Node-srs for it to _not_ migrate, same for > >> Node-millstone. > >> Nodejs transition is also required for acorn transition, from what I > >read > >> on the mailing list. > >> > >> As it's been pending now, for a long time and there's not much to be > >done > >> except fixing these last 2-3 blockers, which will be removed (from > >testing) > >> anyway. > >> Would it be a good time to start the transition? > >> If yes, It would be great to start in other transitions, :) > >> > > > > > >Right now node is waiting upon icu >= 64, which won't be in sid before > >~may. > > Any blockers for that? Can we try asking release team to fast track it? > I don't know. The extra time is to avoid extra work i guess. > > >There is also a problem with node-acorn (it needs the one in > >experimental). > > acorn 6 is in unstable. > Oh. Right.
-- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel