If there are good chances of this being mistaken... Add an inline comment
in the relevant place: that would more likely prevent people mistaking
things...

On Mon, 7 Feb 2022, 6:57 pm Jonas Smedegaard, <[email protected]> wrote:

> Please beware that some packages "missing" some simple tasks may have
> good reason for that.
>
> As a concrete example, source package jsbundle-web-interfaces "lack" a
> Homepage in control file, and an Upstream-Name in copyright file - both
> because that is nonsense for a bundle-only package - none of its
> components is semantically the "main" one despite technically one of
> them need to be treated as such.
>
> If in doubt, ask those who have worked on the package before - they
> might know what they were doing (just might - I am not saying mistakes
> are never made).
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
>  - Jonas
>
> --
>  * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
>  * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
>
>  [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private--
> Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
>
> https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
>
-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

Reply via email to