Hi,
Your upload of monaco-editor-core 0.47.0+ds-1 to the NEW queue has had an
automated review: an LLM-based check of its licensing and packaging, run by the
DFSG team using the Debian Inference service. It is not a decision on the
package, and - like other LLM-based work - it can be wrong.
It found 0 blocker, 0 important, 2 minor issues:
- [minor] [licensing] src/vs/base/common/semver/semver.js is a minified
vendored node-semver bundle shipped without its preferred form for modification
- [minor] [licensing] dompurify/* and marked/* stanzas attribute the vendored
DefinitelyTyped .d.ts files (and cgmanifest.json) to the wrong holders and
licence
You can read the full review here:
https://dfsg-new-queue.debian.org/reviews/monaco-editor-core#assistant-report
Please look at it, and respond by visiting the link below (you'll be asked to
authenticate with Salsa first):
https://dfsg-new-queue.debian.org/llm-review/E4240LWieXYKWz49FbLvalRD5S-A2BYu
There you may choose to reject the upload yourself, while you fix issues and
re-upload, or add comments to clarify or dispute the review.
Your comments are for the DFSG team member who reviews the package, not for the
LLM: it will not read them or reply. Tell the reviewer where you think the
automated review is right or wrong, and why. Comments are public and shown with
the review; you may use markdown, e.g. to link to clarifying information.
If you have any questions, please reply to this e-mail and someone from the
team will respond.
Thanks!
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
